By Sam Frescoe,
Veteran’s Recall
http://veterans-recall.blogspot.com/
On 3 Dec 2015, the Township High
School Board faced a decision to either accept or decline the settlement
offered by the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR) for an
alleged Title IX violation. The district position was that after satisfying
federal inspectors over the course of two years, reasonable accommodations were
already in place and acceptable. On 3 Dec 2015, the Township High School Board
District 211 of Palatine, IL voted (5-2) in favor of accepting the settlement. [i] [ii] [iii]
The purpose of this post is to
review the details of that settlement.
The Terms & Conditions
The settlement, called a Resolution
Agreement, is for OCR Case # 05-14-1055. The settlement is presented in
several sections. Each section contains requirements.
You Need a Mole…At Least One
Section-1 states that District 211 shall designate, or hire
at their expense, at least one government approved mole to reside within their
ranks.
Put Student-A In Charge
Section-2 describes how Student-A and his/her/its parents are
in charge.
Student-A will get full access to all female locker rooms
within the District. Student-A and all consenting girls will use private
changing areas as directed. If any student dissents, then the District must
accommodate the dissenting student in the same way that the OCR stated was a
violation of Title IX when done for Student-A. Any and all changes shall be done in the
“least disruptive manner” to Student-A.
All records documenting the male characteristics of Student-A
shall be collected and hidden.
Student-A and his/her/its parents may decree into existence a
dedicated support group to protect Student-A from feelings of inadequacy, actual
or imagined wrongdoing, voluntary segregation, self-identified discrimination, mean
words, and less-than-likable “anything” that is disagreeable. The group is
required to address any particular issues raised by Student-A and his/her/its
parents in order to “meet the educational needs” of Student-A. Of course, the
team must have a medical doctor to address special health needs.
That’s right, an un-emancipated, minor, male that wants to be
a female is to be coddled every day, for every whim, without exception, and for
the remainder of time he/she/it attends school in the District without regard
to the personal behavior of Student-A.
Restating the Law
Section-3 requires the district to restate the law as the law
already states must be restated through statements of the law.
Spying & Disclosure
Finally, until the OCR decides otherwise, the district will
snitch on itself, and allow the OCR unrestricted access to anyone the OCR sees
fit. By the way, at any time the OCR “may initiate administrative enforcement
or judicial proceedings” to compel the district to act.
Going Forward
So…to eliminate discrimination
against Student-A the government mandates specific rules that only apply to
Student-A and his/her/its parents. Brilliant! The solution for preventing one
person from being treated differently is to mandate that the one person be
treated differently.
Just how is this not circular
reasoning? The answer is simple…there never was acting on reason or empirical
facts. It was always about using “justice” to do what feels good, in the name
of doing what is good, in order to set a cultural precondition aimed at
solidifying federal power at the expense of personal freedom.
Your View
I invite you to tell me what you
believe at samfrescoe@gmail.com. I am
looking forward to addressing your comments and furthering our American
discourse. Thank you. – Sam Frescoe
No comments:
Post a Comment